|
|
Post by virtu on Mar 25, 2010 9:57:05 GMT -8
Sweet Ryden Poster Release. Not a big fan of posters but this one Rocks! Info below from Porterhousewww.porterhouseart.com/product_p/p084.htmPorterhouse Fine Art Editions will be offering a new limited edition lithographic poster on Thursday, April 1, 2010 at 8:00 am PDT. "Incarnation" is one of the new paintings from Mark Ryden's "The Gay Nineties Show," which opens Thursday, April 29, 2010, at Paul Kasmin Gallery in New York, NY. [ view exhibition information ] The poster is printed on heavyweight paper, signed and numbered, and is embossed with the Porterhouse seal in the lower right-hand corner. This poster comes with a certificate of authenticity. Edition Quantity - 500 Poster Size - 37" x 26" Price - $500 Sales of this poster will be limited to one per person and/or address. This poster is available unframed only. The poster will only be available through our online store at www.porterhouseart.com. The "Incarnation" poster will be released on Thursday, April 1, 2010 at 8:00 am PDT.  www.porterhouseart.com/product_p/p084.htm |
|
|
|
Post by rhinomilk on Mar 25, 2010 12:35:02 GMT -8
extremely tempting.... but it saying "90's" and not " '90s " bothers me (should it?)
|
|
|
|
Post by commandax on Mar 25, 2010 12:46:21 GMT -8
extremely tempting.... but it saying "90's" and not " '90s " bothers me (should it?) It would drive me crazy. |
|
|
|
Post by virtu on Mar 25, 2010 13:11:33 GMT -8
I would frame/matt to image.
My framing will be:
Large ornate frame, hand wrapped 2 1/2 inch linen scoop/liner, ornate filet to match frame, matching 1 1/2 inch hand wrapped linen beveled foam core matt next to image.
|
|
|
|
Post by epicfai on Mar 25, 2010 15:58:02 GMT -8
i wonder if that was an intentional grammatical error? who knows. cool image though!
|
|
|
|
Post by droow2 on Mar 25, 2010 16:16:54 GMT -8
I would frame/matt to image. My framing will be: Large ornate frame, hand wrapped 2 1/2 inch linen scoop/liner, ornate filet to match frame, matching 1 1/2 inch hand wrapped linen beveled foam core matt next to image. Dunno what the majority of that means, but it sounds bloody great!!!! |
|
soma
New Member
Posts: 40
|
Post by soma on Mar 25, 2010 18:04:30 GMT -8
extremely tempting.... but it saying "90's" and not " '90s " bothers me (should it?) It would drive me crazy. hahaha i'm glad i'm not the only one!! |
|
|
|
Post by Weezy on Mar 25, 2010 19:49:58 GMT -8
I vote for "would bother me." But I also always use an initial capital for "I" and "I'm" even if increasingly out of favor in the texting environment. And that's just me...  Weezy |
|
|
|
Post by grotesqueanimal on Mar 26, 2010 2:18:50 GMT -8
I want this really bad...although that error would bug me everytime I looked at it, too. I have been working now as a proof reader for a long time (in German, just in case you wonder) so I should be glad that people cannot spell properly, but actually it sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by grotesqueanimal on Apr 1, 2010 7:07:48 GMT -8
Just a heads up, it is available now. And this comes as no surprise...I got mine, order placed at 7:59  |
|
|
|
Post by epicfai on Apr 1, 2010 7:52:18 GMT -8
sold out! (no surprise there) congrats, katrin. would love to see the OG of this in the flesh, so to speak. |
|
|
|
Post by grotesqueanimal on Apr 1, 2010 8:11:28 GMT -8
sold out! (no surprise there) congrats, katrin. would love to see the OG of this in the flesh, so to speak. Me too. I must admit I have never seen original work from him yet, which is really a shame. I hope he is showing in Rome again sometime. |
|
|
|
Post by svenman on Apr 1, 2010 13:00:31 GMT -8
I vote for "would bother me." But I also always use an initial capital for "I" and "I'm" even if increasingly out of favor in the texting environment. And that's just me... Weezy haha. i'm pretty much an 'anti-capitalist' myself congrats katrin. i'm sure the print is beautiful. i was lucky enough to see the stunning original at basel. here's a couple of close ups.    ...and for scale....  |
|
|
|
Post by pricklypete on Apr 2, 2010 9:38:22 GMT -8
hmmm, one on ebay already...at a 500% mark up, of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by collector59 on Apr 2, 2010 12:49:27 GMT -8
I have this print available for $750.00 on my website:https://www.limageriegallery.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=RYDENM152. I don't really understand the $2500.00 listing.
|
|
|
|
Post by pricklypete on Apr 2, 2010 12:58:05 GMT -8
I have this print available for $750.00 on my website:https://www.limageriegallery.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=RYDENM152. I don't really understand the $2500.00 listing. greed. |
|
|
|
Post by collector59 on Apr 2, 2010 13:14:36 GMT -8
Well, that is an interesting concept. When the galleries sell the artwork everyone knows that a company is going to make a profit to pay for overhead. But what do you think of the collectors that buy the artwork or prints only to resell them at a profit?
|
|
|
|
Post by pricklypete on Apr 2, 2010 18:11:45 GMT -8
Ultimately I guess if that's what you're into it for that's your choice. if you're on top of it enough to score a piece and want to resell it, of course no one is gonna pass it along to a total stranger for nothing. I'm just saying 500% after one day seems excessive.
Also, the greed comment wasn't directed at you.
|
|
